Bibliografía abreviada española. Madrid: Asociación Española de Normalización, 1995. Aitchison J, Gilchrist A, Bawden D. Thesaurus construction. 3 ed. London: Aslib, 1997. Ankeny ML. Evaluating end-user services: success or satisfaction? J Acad L.ibr 1991; 16(6):352—6 . Bates M. How to use controlled vocabularies more effectively in online searching. Online 1988; 12(6):45-56. Bates M. Rethinking subject cataloging in the online environment. Library resources and technical services 1989; 33(4):400- 12. Beall J. Dewey for Windows. Advances in knowledge organization 1996; 5:396- 405. Beheshti J. The evolving OPAC. Cataloging and classification quarterly 1997; 24(1/ 2): 163-85. Bessant L. Users of public online catalogs want sophisticated subject access. American libraries 1982; l4(3):160. Bishop D. Technical services in health science libraries: an introduction. En: Darling L. Bishop D, Colaianni LA. Handbook of medical library practice. 4 ed. Chicago: MLA, 1983:1-26. Bloomfield M. A look at subject headings: a plea for standardization. Cataloging and classification quarterly 1993; 16(1): 1 19- 24. BNE. Autoridades de la Biblioteca Nacional de España en CDROM. Londres: Chadwyck- Healey, 1998. Borgman CL. Why are online catalogs still hard to me. Joumal of the American Society for lnformation Science 1996; 47(7):493-503. Broadbent E. The online catalog: dictionary, classised, or both? Cataloging and classification quarterly 1989; 10(2): 105- 17. Buckland MK. Agenda for online catalog designers. lnfomiation technology and libraries 1992; ll(2):157-63. Buxton AB. Computer searching of UDC numbers. Journal of documentation 1990: 46(3): 193-127. AENOR. Clasificación decimal universal. 7 ed. access: the ADFA experiment. College and research libraries 1988; 49(5):43—6 . Carlyle A. Matchlng LCSH and user Vocabulary in the library catalog. Cataloging and classification quarterly 1989; 10(2):37- 63. Carpenter M, ed. National and intemational bibliographic databases. Binghamton NY: Haworth Press, 1988. CAlCYT. FOCAD: Fonnato común argentino para documentos. 3 ed. Buenos Aires: CAlCYT, 1991. CENL. COBRA: Computerised bibliographic records actions. sL: CENL, 1997. http:/ /portico.bl.uk/gabriel/en/projects/ cobra.html. 3h: 1 LM. Library of Congress classification as an online retrieval tool: potentials and limitations. Information technology and libraries 1986; 5(3):l81—92. Chan LM. A subject cataloging code? Cataloging and classification quarterly 1989; 10(2):199-202. Chan LM. lnter-indexer consistency in subject cataloging. Information technology and libraries 1989; 8(4):349-58 . Chan LM. Subject analysis tools online: the challenge ahead. information technology and libraries 1990; 9(3):258-62. Cherry JM. lmproving subject access in OPACs: an exploratory study of conversion of users’ queries. Journal of academic librrianship 1992; l8(2):95-9. Chressanthis JD. The reclassification decision: Dewey or Library of Congress? Cataloging and classification quarterly 1995; 19(3/4):169-82. Clayton M. Gestión de automatización de bi- bliotecas. Madrid: Fundación Gennán Sánchez Ruipérez, 1991 (Biblioteca del libro). CNEA. ll Jornadas Nacionales y l Latinoameri- canas y del Caribe sobre Microisis: Bue- nos Aires, 15 al 23 de junio de 1992. Buenos Aires: CNEA, 1992. CNEA. ll Jornadas Nacionales y l Latinoanleri- Byrne A, Micco M. lmproving OPAC subject nos Aires, 15 al 23 de junio de 1992. Suplemento. Buenos Aires: CNEA. 71 canas y del Caribe sobre Microisis: Bue-
